Three months earlier than anticipated, CMS published its final local coverage determination (LCD) for continuous glucose monitors and included more people with diabetes than expected. The new policy expands coverage from individuals with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes using multiple daily injections of insulin to anyone treated with insulin, essentially doubling the market for manufacturers of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs).
The U.S. CMS has unveiled a proposed national coverage determination for powered seat elevation systems for Group 3 power wheelchairs, one of the more expensive items in the category of mobility durable medical equipment (DME). However, the agency indicated that it will soon examine coverage of powered seat elevation systems for Group 2 power wheelchairs, the combination of which suggests that manufacturers in the DME space are looking at a market that seems poised to explode.
Despite pleas from patient advocacy groups and bipartisan pressure from the U.S. Congress, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) isn’t budging on its national coverage determination for amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibodies approved to treat Alzheimer’s.
Now that the U.S. FDA has granted accelerated approval for Biogen Inc./Eisai Co. Ltd.’s early Alzheimer’s drug, Leqembi (lecanemab), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is being pressured to rethink its coverage of amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibodies.
In decrying high U.S. drug prices, lawmakers often cite statistics about the number of patients who forgo or ration their prescriptions because of the out-of-pocket cost. Those discussions overlook the role payer utilization management tactics, including prior authorization, may play in patients abandoning their treatment, be it a specific drug or an imaging service.
A trio of proposed Medicare drug payment models that made a Feb. 14 debut in the U.S. is playing to mixed reviews. Two of the models to be tested by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Innovation Center seem to “address the real problems underlying prescription drug pricing – patient out-of-pocket expenses and better payment systems that reward the value a medicine brings to the patient and the overall health care system,” said John Murphy, chief policy officer for the Biotechnology Innovation Organization. But he called the third model, which is expected to restrict Medicare payment for some Part B drugs that have indications with accelerated approval, “an attack on the accelerated approval pathway,” which Congress mandated to spur investment and innovation in areas of unmet medical need.
In decrying high U.S. drug prices, lawmakers often cite statistics about the number of patients who forgo or ration their prescriptions because of the out-of-pocket cost. Those discussions overlook the role payer utilization management tactics, including prior authorization, may play in patients abandoning their treatment, be it a specific drug or an imaging service.
While the new inflation-based rebate on certain Part B drugs may generate billions of dollars in savings for Medicare, implementing the rebate could be more challenging than the U.S. Congress and the Biden administration expected when the Inflation Reduction Act was enacted last August.
With the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act in the U.S. in August 2022, biopharma company leaders have re-evaluated pipelines, sought legal advice, and discussed ways to mitigate the potential impacts the legislation will have on pricing therapies and extending their reach to new indications.
Although the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act charges the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services with negotiating prices of the Part B and D drugs with the highest Medicare spend, the first two rounds of negotiations will focus solely on Part D drugs, which are dispensed through pharmacies.
RSS
