The U.S. FDA’s Jan. 14 webinar for the new Quality Management System Regulation included some fairly predictable content, but one member of the FDA staff mentioned that the agency now expects corporate management to demonstrate the correct “attitude” with regard to product quality, suggesting that agency staff will be more keen to crack down on firms that dispute the agency’s perspectives on quality management.
The U.S. FDA’s attempts to harmonize with other nations on quality management received a dose of good news recently when the International Organization for Standards decided to stand pat on ISO 13485, which also leaves the FDA’s Quality Management System Regulation intact.
The U.S. FDA’s Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) is not technically in force until Feb. 2, 2026, but a new draft guidance from the agency’s device center seems to indicate that there is a strong element of retroactivity to the QMSR.
The U.S. FDA’s device center has been prodding industry for some time to develop a culture of quality regarding the manufacture of medical devices, an emphasis that has resulted in the development of several programs. While the recent harmonization of the FDA’s device quality system regulation with an international standard might seem oblique to this culture of quality consideration, the FDA’s Keisha Thomas advised industry that the overhaul of the Quality System Regulation (QSR) is seen inside the agency as part and parcel of that quality push, a statement that seems to suggest that the FDA’s expectations regarding device manufacturing will be more stringent going forward.
The U.S. FDA dropped the final rule for the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR), the long-awaited blending of the agency’s own Quality System Regulation (QSR) and ISO 13485.
The U.S. FDA’s proposal to restructure the Quality System Regulation (QSR) with ISO 13485, the international quality system standard, is a major shift for affected industry, but there are strictly administrative issues associated with this proposal. Several of those who have commented to the docket have expressed misgivings as to the proposed 12-month compliance deadline upon issuance of a final rule.
The attempt by the U.S. FDA to harmonize its Quality System Regulation (QSR) with ISO 13485 promises to be a difficult slog, but Jeff Shuren, director of the agency’s device center, said the agency is flexible on the proposed one-year implementation deadline. However, Shuren also noted that the draft rule would not be converted into a final rule at any point during the current calendar year, leaving device makers with an extended term of uncertainty.
The FDA’s proposal to harmonize the Quality System Regulation (QSR) with ISO 13485 has finally become more than just a hot topic among device makers, and the agency held a March 2 advisory hearing on the matter. One of the critical concerns for industry is the proposal of a one-year term of implementation upon publication of a final harmonization rule, a timeline that some argue should be doubled or tripled in order to serve as a practicable implementation timeline.
Small American device manufacturers are more likely to sell their products only in the U.S., and thus the FDA proposal to more closely align the Quality System Regulation (QSR) with ISO 13485 would seem to place unwarranted demands on these companies.
The U.S. FDA has at last published what is nominally a draft rule for harmonization of the Quality System Regulation (QSR) with an international standard, ISO 13485, but the draft rule is conspicuous for the absence of specifics.
