The FDA’s ability, or lack thereof, to churn out guidances is not always the stuff of industrial outrage, but manufacturers of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) systems might find the timing of a new draft guidance on the procedure somewhat odd. The draft guidance arrives nearly a decade and a half after an April 2008 advisory hearing.
Sarepta Therapeutics Inc. said it plans to file a BLA for its gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), SRP-9001, with the U.S. FDA, potentially setting up a decision in the first half of 2023 for the therapy developed in partnership with Switzerland’s Roche Holding AG. The Cambridge, Mass.-based biotech said the BLA will seek accelerated approval for the therapy, also known as delandistrogene moxeparvovec, for ambulant individuals with DMD.
Regulatory snapshots, including global submissions and approvals, clinical trial approvals and other regulatory decisions and designations: Dyansys, Lenstec.
Regulatory snapshots, including global drug submissions and approvals, clinical trial approvals and other regulatory decisions and designations: Acer, Astria, Kira, Marinus, Quoin, Sareum, Step, Turning Point.
Med tech patents have been especially vulnerable to litigation in recent years, and a new decision by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirms yet again the vulnerability of patents undergoing litigation. The Federal Circuit said nine claims found in two patents held by Becon Medical Ltd., of Batavia, Ill., were invalid due to obviousness, presenting the company a significant loss in its infringement litigation with Talexmedical LLC, of Malvern, Pa.
Drug and device makers that offer health care professionals opportunities to earn continuing medical education (CME) points have a fine line to walk when sponsoring those programs, but a new advisory opinion by the Office of Inspector General at the Department of Health and Human Services seems to draw a very clear line around those programs.
While the U.S. Senate Finance Committee is ostensibly investigating how big pharma is using the 2017 tax changes to avoid paying its fair share of U.S. taxes, at least one medical device company has been drawn into the probe and is being scolded for not cooperating.
Regulatory snapshots, including global drug submissions and approvals, clinical trial approvals and other regulatory decisions and designations: Lexicon, MBX, Novartis, Soligenix, Veru.
For companies in the life sciences, patent subject matter eligibility has acquired a bad reputation, but the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has attempted to provide administrative workarounds to the problem. PTO director Kathi Vidal said recently, however, that the agency intends to revisit its guidance, just one of several steps the PTO is taking to eliminate some of the drag on patent applications in the U.S.
RSS
