Regulation of the digital health space is in some respects fundamentally different from traditional hardware medical devices, a fact that was highlighted during a Nov. 12 webinar hosted by the U.S. FDA. Nonetheless, several participants in the webinar made the point that the twin problems of coverage and reimbursement are critical issues for digital health as well, a problem that some see as requiring more collaboration between the FDA and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

As might be expected, device makers have a lot of nice things to say about a recent proposal by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to automatically cover technologies designated as breakthrough devices by the FDA. However, two trade associations and the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) all expressed serious misgivings about a proposal to define the term “reasonable and necessary” as possibly contingent on private payer coverage.

If a new federal rule withstands politics and potential court challenges, U.S. health care prices may finally be freed from their historic black box. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, along with the Departments of Labor and the Treasury, issued the Transparency in Coverage final rule Oct. 29 requiring most private health plans to disclose pricing and cost-sharing information so Americans will know in advance how much they will have to pay for prescription drugs, medical devices and other health care products and services.