In a 5-4 decision June 27, the U.S. Supreme Court scuttled a Purdue Pharma LP’s bankruptcy plan that would have discharged any claims against the Sackler family, which owned and controlled the company that made billions of dollars from its sales of Oxycontin (oxycodone).
In reviving another case involving drug label carveouts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit insisted that its June 25 decision in Amarin Pharma Inc. v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc will not kill so-called skinny labels that allow generics to come to market when some of the brand’s indications still have patent protection.
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld the FDA’s relaxed regulation of the abortion drug mifepristone when it ruled June 13 that the organizations challenging those changes lacked the standing to do so.
The U.S. FTC’s campaign against the Orange Book listing of patents claiming device components gained momentum when a federal judge in New Jersey ordered Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. to delist five device patents pertaining to its Proair HFA (albuterol sulfate) inhaler.
Weighing in on the side of 21 drug and device companies accused of knowingly aiding and abetting terrorist attacks against U.S. troops and civilians in Iraq from 2005 to 2011, the U.S. solicitor general is asking the Supreme Court to grant the companies’ petition for cert and then vacate a 2022 appellate court decision in Joshua Atchley v. Astrazeneca plc, remanding it for reconsideration in light of a related opinion the justices handed down a year ago.
In lieu of pending guidance, the U.S. FDA’s approval May 20 of Biocon Biologics Ltd.’s Yesafili and Samsung Bioepis Co. Ltd.’s Opuviz as interchangeable biosimilars to Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s Eylea (aflibercept) provides further insight into how the agency is approaching the market exclusivity the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act awards to the first approved interchangeable for any given biologic.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has no rulemaking authority over the 340B prescription drug discount program, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said May 21 as it handed the government its second big loss in the ongoing debate over whether drug manufacturers have to give unlimited contract pharmacies the steep discounts the program provides to certain health care providers.
Buyers challenging patent settlements involving Forest Laboratories LLC’s blood pressure drug, Bystolic (nebivolol), failed to show the deals were illegal pay-for-delay arrangements, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said in unanimously affirming a lower court’s two-time dismissal of the buyers’ antitrust suit.
Just a few days after the U.S. Congressional Research Service issued a report suggesting ways Congress could resolve the unanswered questions about patent listings in the FDA’s Orange Book, the FTC sent a second round of warning letters to eight biopharma companies and their subsidiaries, citing the listing of device patents for combination products.
The U.S. government chalked up another win April 29 against the constitutional challenges to the Inflation Reduction Act’s provision mandating direct Medicare price negotiations for selected prescription drugs.
RSS
