FDA recalls are fairly commonplace events and infrequently require any field corrections of inventory on the market, but Puritan-Bennett Corp. has asked customers to quarantine 135 of the company’s 980 series ventilators due to assembly problems that could cause the devices to cease operating.

Dublin-based Medtronic plc’s Micra pacemaker was a groundbreaking device when the FDA approved the leadless pacemaker in 2016, thanks to the elimination of the hazards associated with pacemaker leads. However, the FDA said recently that the risks associated with cardiac perforation with leadless pacemakers, such as tamponade or death, might be higher with the Micra than with pacemakers with leads.

The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finally laid to rest the rule for Medicare Coverage of Innovative Technology (MCIT), a policy proposal that found favor with industry and with several patient groups. However, the news comes shortly after a bipartisan group of 10 senators had penned a letter to the agency to reissue the rule, reinforcing the prospect that the MCIT proposal will find widespread support in the halls of Congress in 2022.

The FDA categorized the recall of more than 2.2 million Ellume Pty Ltd. COVID-19 Home Tests that began Oct. 5 as a class I recall, “the most serious type of recall.” While the agency has received significant criticism lately about ambiguity in recalls that often leaves consumers uncertain about their seriousness, the FDA eliminated all doubt on this one saying, “use of these tests may cause serious adverse health consequences or death.” The FDA said it received 35 reports of false positives associated with the antigen test. No deaths have been reported.

The FDA reported Oct. 14 that software used with the Alinity m test kit by Abbott Laboratories is being recalled for the potential for false positive results, a problem due to software used to automate the processing of the test. This recall was originally issued in mid-September, but the Abbott Park, Ill.-based company is advising labs to treat any test result as presumptive at best.

Device makers have argued for years that not all medical device recalls are the same, and thus the FDA should be more forthcoming with the public about the difference between a recall that is accompanied by a market withdrawal and a recall that driven by something as innocuous as a minor adjustment to the product label.

The FDA reported two class I recalls associated with insulin pumps made by Dublin-based Medtronic plc, albeit for two significantly different issues. The two recalls affect roughly 495,000 units combined, and may significantly affect access to some patients. One of the recalls was for Minimed 600 series insulin pumps, a recall announced in 2019 and expanded in October. The recall addresses the risk of incorrect dosing of insulin due to a faulty clear retainer ring, which is used to lock the insulin cartridge into place in the insulin pump reservoir. The second recall is for remote controllers used with Medtronic insulin pumps. In this instance, the action was undertaken due to cybersecurity concerns, although the controllers in question are no longer in distribution.