The guidances for in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) developed by the European Union’s Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) are only a reflection of the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR), but they do provide test developers with some important details.
We’ve been hearing for several years about an FDA proposal to overhaul its device regulatory framework with ISO 13485, potentially the most ambitious FDA undertaking in a quarter century. Those who don’t follow these things might find the subject terminally boring, but such a change could be a massive headache for industry, although it doesn’t have to be if the FDA can get the temperature of this regulatory porridge just right.
The FDA’s device center has repeatedly asserted that its goal is to ensure that patients in the U.S. will always have first access to the latest and greatest in med tech, and a new priority document resurrects that goal in principle. However, the latest strategic plan qualifies that metric as half of manufacturers of novel technologies bringing their devices to the U.S. market “first, or in parallel with other major markets” by the end of 2025.
Despite mandating earlier this year that private health insurance plans make over-the-counter COVID tests free to their subscribers, the U.S. CMS took until Feb. 3 to make the same benefit available to Medicare beneficiaries. The problem is that these tests will not be available to Medicare beneficiaries free of charge until “early spring,” the agency said, a point in time by which the latest surge of the pandemic is likely to have dissipated.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) reported Feb. 1 that it had recouped more than $5.6 billion in settlements in connection with False Claims Act litigation (FCA) in 2021, with $5 billion of that amount derived from action against the health care industry.
The COVID-19 pandemic shone a bright light on the need for and utility of telehealth, which in turn prompted the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to temporarily expand telehealth coverage. Some of those coverage policies are set to expire when the public health emergency ends, and a group of stakeholders, including the American College of Cardiology, are urging Congress to pass legislation that would make some of these benefits permanent, a potential boon for many telehealth entities.
The availability of rapid antigen tests for the COVID-19 pandemic has been far short of ideal in recent weeks despite a recent order by the Biden administration for half a billion tests. The question of whether additional federal dollars are forthcoming for additional tests is up in the air, however, due to congressional concerns that there is roughly $800 million in unspent federal dollars, a signal that any additional monies might not be made available any time in the near term.
The U.K. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has endorsed the use of selective laser therapy treatment (SLT) instead of eyedrops as treatment of chronic open-angle glaucoma (COAG) and ocular hypertension. The shift would seem to drive spending in the U.K. away from drugs and toward devices for a condition afflicting nearly 10% of citizens over the age of 75.
U.S. FDA regulation of combination products has always been complicated, and a new final guidance takes up the long-standing controversy over FDA review of these applications. The final guidance makes explicit the possibility that the individual components of a cross-labeled combination product will be reviewed separately, a concession that industry saw as critical to ensure that these applications can make it through the FDA gauntlet without undue delay.
The quinquennial user fee process for medical devices has always proven controversial, but the FDA and industry have missed a Jan. 15 deadline for an agreement to be presented to Congress. Recently, several members of the House and Senate inked a letter to the FDA about the missed deadline, a signal that the agency’s aspirations for a $2.5 billion user fee deal are in jeopardy.