Makers of dental equipment don’t typically show up on the U.S. FDA enforcement radar screen, but the introduction of biologics and software into routine dental practice has upped the regulatory stakes. This can be seen in the June 20, 2023, warning to Vitang Technology LLC, of Tustin, Calif., which cited the company for failure to validate a change of software used in orthodontic treatment planning systems, but the FDA reinforced the notion that claiming that the agency approved or cleared the device is also a violation of the Code of Federal Regulations.
The U.K. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has undertaken a public consultation for a series of proposed changes to its procedures for evaluating medical devices and other medical technologies that could speed up these reviews. This new process would require a less time-consuming approach to evaluating lower-risk technologies that would not only turn around such evaluations more rapidly but would also leave more resources available for higher-risk products that would also enjoy a timelier review, thus potentially accelerating adoption of all these products in the National Health System.
Sotera Health Holdings LLC has finalized a $408 million settlement for litigation over the company’s use of ethylene oxide (EtO) at a Sterigenics facility in Willowbrook, Ill., although litigation is still pending in connection with sites in other U.S. states. The news comes as med-tech trade associations register their disappointment with an EPA proposed rule for EtO that both the Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) and the Advanced Medical Technology Association (Advamed) argue would crimp availability of sterilization capacity, which would in turn create shortages of medical devices and supplies that are desperately needed by patients.
The U.S. Office of Inspector General (OIG) has concluded an analysis that found fault with Medicare payments for genetic testing under CPT code 81408, a code that covers tests for a variety of mutations of medical interest. According to OIG, these claims were often paid $2,000 each despite poor oversight from Medicare administrative contractors (MACs), raising the risk that a substantial percentage of roughly $888 million in claims paid between 2018 and 2021 were either fraudulent or at best inappropriate.
U.S. Medicare coverage for breakthrough devices has been a hot topic for several years now, but industry is one step closer to making this policy dream a reality thanks to another new proposal from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). The agency released a new version of the Transitional Coverage for Emerging Technologies (TCET) program that seems to satisfy most of what med-tech trade associations sought, but the catch is that manufacturers must notify CMS of their intent to take part in TCET a year before the FDA will decide whether to grant market authorization to the device.
The U.S. FDA reported a pilot program for validation of lab-developed tests (LDTs) used as companion diagnostics, a move that seems an implicit recognition that test kits as CDx products are not the darlings of test developers. The program arrives as the agency is considering rulemaking for regulation of LDTs, however, a combination of developments that promises to roil the already strained relationship between the FDA and clinical labs.
The question of when U.S. federal attorneys can dismiss a whistleblower suit filed under the False Claims Act (FCA) has roiled the courts for several years, but the Supreme Court has laid many of those questions to rest in an 8-1 ruling which said that the government can dismiss a whistleblower FCA case only after federal attorneys have intervened.
The U.K. Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has moved to incorporate the Global Medical Device Nomenclature (GMDN) system into its device registration database, a development that will ease the task of providing postmarket surveillance for these products. However, the change may also take some of the noise out of the registration process in the U.K. market, thanks to the standardization of information the GMDN represents.
The EU’s In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) has not yet been fully implemented, but Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Authority (TGA) is wasting no time attempting to harmonize with the IVDR.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reported a settlement with San Francisco-based 1Health.io Inc. for allegations that the consumer gene testing company failed to properly secure customers’ data, an oversight that will cost the company only $75,000 in fines.
