The COVID-19 pandemic encouraged a lot of things, including shoddy product quality, but a recent FDA warning letter suggests that the associated need for tests also encouraged a few operations that had less than a full commitment to quality management.
It’s not always obvious whether a claim found in a patent is obvious to a “person having ordinary skill” while the patent is still in prosecution, but that lack of clarity came back to bite Best Medical International Inc., of Springfield, Va. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that a patent for conformal radiotherapy held by Best included three claims that would have been obvious to this mythical person of ordinary skill, handing a win to Stockholm-based Elekta AB, maker of the Gamma Knife radiotherapy system.
Medical science has been experimenting with smart devices for several years to determine whether these products can detect circulatory system diseases, and a study presented at the 2022 meeting of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC 2022) seems to strongly suggest that the answer is a resounding yes. The eBRAVE-AF study of more than 5,500 enrollees of middle age or older demonstrated the ability of a smartphone camera and a downloadable app to at beat conventional screening for atrial fibrillation (AF), a finding that could save lives and boost the prospects of device makers in the digital health space.
There may be those who believe that artificial intelligence (AI) is suffering from overexposure in the media, but these software algorithms are nonetheless challenging medical professionals in their use of medical diagnostics. A new study showed that an AI algorithm not only bested the sonographer in interpretation of whether cardiac ultrasound was indicative of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but also that the results were sufficiently vigorous that the reviewing cardiologist couldn’t distinguish between the sonographer’s interpretations and those provided by the algorithm.
The use of leads for cardiac electrophysiology devices has proven nothing short of controversial in the past, usually an artifact of efforts to craft ever-skinnier leads that won’t disrupt the blood vessels into which they are placed. Dublin-based Medtronic plc is working to avoid these problems with leads without sacrificing the advantages of leads via its EV ICD system, which soundly passed the test in a study presented at this year’s edition of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) annual scientific sessions.
Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp., of Plainsboro, N.J., said in its latest 8K filing that it has decided to voluntarily remove all the company’s Cerelink systems – which are indicated for intracranial pressure monitoring – due to customer reports that these monitors were returning inaccurate pressure readings.
Litigation over how to assign royalties for intellectual property with an offshore subsidiary doesn’t consume the kind of billable attorney hours that patent disputes do, but the question can affect a multinational corporation’s bottom line in significant ways. The U.S. Tax Court recently decided on a method for assigning royalties to a Medtronic plc subsidiary located in Puerto Rico that fell between the rate sought by Medtronic and the rate sought by an appeals court, but that ultimate rate was close to that preferred by Medtronic, handing the company a better outcome than it might have predicted when the IRS filed suit.
Payers are known to have a significant burden in crafting coverage and reimbursement policies for in vitro diagnostics, but Gillian Hooker, chief scientific officer at Concert Genetics Inc., of Nashville, Tenn., told an audience at the Next Generation DX Summit that the dilemma may be more expensive than commonly appreciated. Hooker said administrative costs may add as much as $125 per administered test, an artifact of a fragmented value chain that seems to enjoy few, if any prospects of improvement in the near term.
The recall of CPAP, BiPAP and ventilator devices made by Philips Respironics Inc., of Murrysville, Pa., is now in its second year, but the rate of reported adverse events was exceedingly low prior to the onset of the June 2021 recall. Those numbers continued to climb in May, June and July of 2022, however, reaching 48,000 medical device reports and 44 deaths said to be associated with the recalled devices, a pace that would easily overwhelm the volume of reports seen in the 12 months ending April 30, 2022.
Valentine’s Day is a great day for creating that tingly feeling, but Abbott Park, Ill.-based Abbott Laboratories believes that this is not a good sensation for patients who are in search of pain relief via spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices. Thus, the company touts its Proclaim Plus as a system that delivers a tightly titrated charge to multiple sites on the spinal cord to generate an analgesic effect without that tingling sensation, an outcome the company said is preferred by 87% of those in need of SCS for pain relief.