BioWorld. Link to homepage.

Clarivate
  • BioWorld
  • BioWorld Science
  • BioWorld Asia
  • Data Snapshots
    • Biopharma
    • Medical technology
    • Infographics: Dynamic digital data analysis
    • Index insights
    • NME Digest
  • Special reports
    • Infographics: Dynamic digital data analysis
    • Ebola outbreak
    • Hantavirus
    • Trump administration impacts
    • Med-tech outlook 2026
    • Under threat: mRNA vaccine research
    • BioWorld at 35
    • Biopharma M&A scorecard
    • Bioworld 2025 review
    • BioWorld MedTech 2025 review
    • BioWorld Science 2025 review
    • Women's health
    • China's GLP-1 landscape
    • PFA re-energizes afib market
    • China CAR T
    • Alzheimer's disease
    • Coronavirus
    • More reports can be found here

BioWorld. Link to homepage.

  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Subscribe
BioWorld - Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Home » Blogs » BioWorld Perspectives » What’s 10 minus Four? Not Six, Apparently

BioWorld Perspectives
BioWorld Perspectives RSS FeedRSS

BioWorld / Vaccines

What’s 10 minus Four? Not Six, Apparently

Nov. 30, 2012
By Anette Breindl

Dec. 1 is World AIDS Day, and when I reflect on AIDS, I generally do it with a sense of amazement about how far we have come in the treatment of HIV since AIDS first came to the attention of the U.S. medical establishment, in form of a cluster of pneumocystis pneumonia infections in young men, in 1981. An AIDS-free generation is no longer a pipe dream.

With all the progress that’s being made, though, I’ve been struck how one thing that seems to keep receding into the distance – like a manifestation of the joke that the future is always coming but never here – is a vaccine.

In February 2008, David Baltimore, said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science that a vaccine has been at least 10 years away for the past 20 years.

Fast-forward to the July 2012 International AIDS conference, where Gary Nabel, director of the Vaccine Research Institute at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease, said that vaccines are “at least 10 years away under the best of circumstances.”

The reason this seems so striking to me is that I’ve written about AIDS vaccines for a number of years now, and there were significant advances in the time period between those two statements. In 2008, Baltimore characterized the AIDS vaccine situation as "there is no AIDS vaccine and no hopeful candidate vaccine."

Just a year later, the RV144 or Thai trial became the first clinical trial to demonstrate efficacy of an HIV vaccine, though the risk reduction was too modest to make the vaccine an option for widespread immunization campaigns.

Since then, dozens of broadly neutralizing antibodies have been identified that might form the basis of a vaccine. Researchers have gained new insights into how the B cell and T cell arms of the immune system each contribute to immunity in experimental HIV vaccines. And in one preclinical trial, about 50 percent of monkeys were protected against contracting SIV, and some appeared to be able to clear the infection, after vaccination with a viral vector-delivered vaccine.

So, dear readers: use the comments and give us your opinion. When will we be five years, instead of 10 years, away from an HIV vaccine? (“In five years” wins smart-aleck points but otherwise does not count.) And what will it take?

Popular Stories

  • Today's news in brief

    BioWorld
    BioWorld briefs for May 22, 2026.
  • Brain and DNA

    Sangamo presents primate data for prion suppressor ST-506

    BioWorld Science
    Sangamo Therapeutics Inc. discussed gene regulation approaches for neurodegenerative diseases when presenting findings on their clinical candidate ST-506 for the...
  • TREM2 agonists detailed in Pfizer patent

    BioWorld Science
    Pfizer Inc. has reported new triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) agonists potentially useful for the treatment of neurodegeneration.
  • Red dart and target against blue sky

    Unmasking the X: EPAC2 shifts the fragile X landscape

    BioWorld
    Researchers at UCLA have shown that divergent neuronal signaling in fragile X mice converges on EPAC2, a druggable target whose inhibition restores circuit...
  • Skin irritation on hands

    Recludix presents STAT1/3 inhibitors for dermatological diseases

    BioWorld Science
    Recludix Pharma Inc. recently presented data on their new STAT1/3 inhibitors REX-6553 and REX-6547 for treating dermatological inflammatory skin diseases.
  • BioWorld
    • Today's news
    • Analysis and data insight
    • Clinical
    • Data Snapshots
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Medical technology
    • Newco news
    • Opinion
    • Regulatory
  • BioWorld Science
    • Today's news
    • Biomarkers
    • Cancer
    • Conferences
    • Endocrine/metabolic
    • Immune
    • Infection
    • Neurology/psychiatric
    • NME Digest
    • Patents
  • BioWorld Asia
    • Today's news
    • Analysis and data insight
    • Australia
    • China
    • Clinical
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Newco news
    • Regulatory
    • Science
  • More
    • About
    • Advertise with BioWorld
    • Archives
    • Article reprints and permissions
    • Contact us
    • Cookie policy
    • Copyright notice
    • Data methodology
    • Infographics: Dynamic digital data analysis
    • Index insights
    • Podcasts
    • Privacy policy
    • Share your news with BioWorld
    • Staff
    • Terms of use
    • Topic alerts
Follow Us

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing