All Clarivate websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.

More information on our cookie policy.

BioWorld. Link to homepage.

Clarivate
  • BioWorld
  • BioWorld MedTech
  • BioWorld Asia
  • BioWorld Science
  • Data Snapshots
    • BioWorld
    • BioWorld MedTech
  • Special reports
    • Artificial intelligence
    • Coronavirus
    • IVDs on the rise
    • Top Biopharma Trends of 2021
    • Top Med-tech Trends of 2021
    • Premium reports
      • BioWorld Financings Reports
      • Disease Incidence & Prevalence Summaries

BioWorld. Link to homepage.

  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Subscribe
BioWorld - Thursday, June 30, 2022
Home » Blogs » BioWorld MedTech Perspectives » Screening saves lives, but criteria too narrow

BioWorld MedTech Perspectives
BioWorld MedTech Perspectives RSS FeedRSS

BioWorld MedTech / Oncology / Diagnostics / Imaging

Screening saves lives, but criteria too narrow

Aug. 2, 2013
By Amanda Pedersen
No Comments

CTA few years back my brother-in-law Sam was starting a new job and was required to get a physical as part of the hiring process. A standard X-ray revealed a spot on his lungs and further testing confirmed it was cancer. The diagnosis came about two years after he’d quit smoking, but he had been a smoker for many years and was somewhere in his early 40s. Thankfully, because it was caught and treated so early, he is still with us today and doing great. But what if he hadn't had that physical? Earlier this week the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force issued a draft recommendation giving its second highest approval rating for routine CT screening for those at high risk for lung cancer. The grade B recommendation was widely applauded by advocacy groups such as the Lung Cancer Alliance, the American College of Radiology, and the Prevent Cancer Foundation. If approved in final form, the recommendation will trigger Medicare and insurance coverage and bring about a dramatic drop in lung cancer deaths. Experts say as many as 20,000 deaths a year could be prevented by screening. Naturally my first thought when I heard about the recommendation was my brother-in-law and all the people like him who could be saved by this move. But the recommendation only applies to current and former smokers age 55 to 80 with a smoking history the equivalent of smoking a pack a day for 30 years or two packs a day for 15 years. My brother-in-law would have been too young to meet that criteria at the time that he was diagnosed. How many other current and former smokers would slip through the cracks? How many of them could be saved by screening if the age range of the recommendation was widened? I don’t claim to be an expert on lung cancer but it seems the criteria needs to be broadened. At least one advocacy group agrees. Legacy, a group that says it supports the task force recommendations but takes issue with some of the specifics, says the age range is too narrow. According to the Lung Cancer Alliance, lung cancer takes 160,000 lives a year. Only 15% of people diagnosed with lung cancer will live five years or longer, primarily because the vast majority of lung cancers are diagnosed at a late stage. Sam was one of the lucky few, but he could have easily been one of the unlucky thousands, had it not been for that one physical that prompted additional screening. Screening saves lives. The task force made an important decision when it issued its draft recommendation, but it would be even better if the minimum age for routine screening was lowered to 40.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Popular Stories

  • Free access to BioWorld coronavirus articles

    BioWorld

    The articles in this collection are from BioWorld’s ongoing coverage of the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak. Note that we have added three critical tables which are...

  • Today's news in brief

    BioWorld
    BioWorld briefs for June 29, 2022.
  • Today's news in brief

    BioWorld MedTech
    BioWorld MedTech's briefs for June 29.
  • Enhertu.png

    Swing low, sweet Enhertu: Astrazeneca, Daiichi ASCO data carry HER2 message home

    BioWorld
    The “showdown” at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting foreseen by one analyst between breast cancer drugs from Gilead Sciences Inc. and...
  • Novavax-COVID-19-vaccine-vial

    Novavax vaccine shows its chops

    BioWorld
    Given that Novavax Inc.’s COVID-19 vaccine will be a latecomer to the U.S. scene if it gets FDA authorization, it’s been cast in a supporting role to the lead...
black cortellis ad

BioWorld Premium

Enjoy extended coverage for the most complete market view with BioWorld, BioWorld MedTech, and BioWorld Asia in a single, easy to access subscription.

Subscribe
  • BioWorld
    • Today's news
    • Analysis and data insight
    • Clinical
    • Data Snapshots
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Newco news
    • Opinion
    • Regulatory
    • Science
  • BioWorld MedTech
    • Today's news
    • Clinical
    • Data Snapshots
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Newco news
    • Opinion
    • Regulatory
    • Science
  • BioWorld Asia
    • Today's news
    • Analysis and data insight
    • Australia
    • China
    • Clinical
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Newco news
    • Regulatory
    • Science
  • BioWorld Science
    • Archives
    • Today's news
    • Search BioWorld Science
    • About
  • More
    • About
    • Archives
    • Article reprints and permissions
    • Contact us
    • Cookie policy
    • Copyright notice
    • Data methodology
    • Podcasts
    • Privacy policy
    • Share your news with BioWorld
    • Staff
    • Terms of use
Follow Us

Copyright ©2022. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing