The U.S. FDA’s device center posted a report on the TAP program, stating that the metrics available to date suggest the program is a rousing success. Still, there are a few key indicators that have not yet had time to emerge – such as product approvals and clearances, but those data points won’t emerge for another year or two at the inside.

The FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health posted two important guidances just in the first week of the new year. The agency seems determined to sustain that pace with a new draft guidance for cuffless blood pressure monitors, apparently in response to sales of unauthorized over-the-counter devices for this indication.

The U.S. FDA’s recent switch toward more routine use of generalist field investigators might be seen in some quarters as an attempt to do more with less, but a session on the topic at the Food and Drug Law Institute’s annual enforcement conference in Washington seems to suggest that this reversal of historic practice presents at least as many problems as solutions for industry.

The FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) will have its hands full with the roll-out of the overhauled quality management regulation, but this will have ripple effects on industry as well. Keisha Thomas, associate director for compliance and quality at CDRH, told an audience in Washington DC that risk management will be a big focus in FDA oversight and inspections in 2026, a point of emphasis that could lead to more routine compliance and enforcement action.

The U.S. FDA’s attempts to harmonize with other nations on quality management received a dose of good news recently when the International Organization for Standards decided to stand pat on ISO 13485, which also leaves the FDA’s Quality Management System Regulation intact.

The U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency has decided to lean into personalized medicine with the adoption of the concept of a “preference zone” for determining when a therapy can and cannot be used for a specific patient, a concept that is liable to lead to more demanding postmarket surveillance.

Eleven pages is relatively short for a modern U.S. FDA draft guidance, but two trade associations nonetheless had questions about the FDA draft for transfers of 510(k) devices, such as how the agency defines the holder of the 510(k).

The next FDA device user fee agreement is formally in negotiations but a recent agency report shows device makers are increasingly keen to interact with FDA reviewers. This is a fact that may make it difficult to keep the next user fee schedule from increasing dramatically over the current agreement.

The U.S. FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health is recovering from a guidance drought that spanned several months in the first part of calendar year 2025, starting with a guidance on the Q-sub process.

The recent staff cuts at the U.S. FDA’s device center caught the attention of outsiders but also caught the attention of those who work on premarket applications for 510(k) and PMA filings.