The U.S. FDA and makers of medical devices have several collaborative programs, but the two sides have joined forces yet again in a new collaboration, this time to address both product quality issues and supply chain resiliency.
The Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC) has played a key role in fostering a stronger industrial appreciation for the need for robust cybersecurity, but a recent MDIC report noted that many device makers are deficient in pushing cybersecurity considerations into the domain of design controls. However, the most critical element in cybersecurity may be whether a company has a chief product security officer (CPSO), the presence of absence of which seems to correlate strongly and uniformly with all aspects of cybersecurity in a manufacturer’s products.
Computational modeling and simulation (CM&S) isn’t the new flavor of the month in the medical device industry, but it hasn’t exactly achieved the status of a buzzword, either. However, the Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC) has published a report which makes clear that these software tools are continuing to open new frontiers in device development, a trend that seems certain to continue to expand in the decades ahead as to-market costs continue to grow.
Cybersecurity has become one of the core concerns for med tech in this part of the 21st Century, and a collaboration between the FDA and the Mitre Corp., has yielded a new playbook that calls for a regional response to issues such as ransomware. However, this new document calls on medical device manufacturers to take part in cybersecurity exercises along with health care delivery organizations, an exercise that some manufacturers might not be prepared to undertake.
The Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC) ran a series of 14 test cases to evaluate the value of real-world evidence (RWE) for regulatory decision making, but there were several sources of drag in this first phase of the project, such as a lack of availability of unique device identifiers (UDIs) for some devices.
The decision by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to suspend the Medicare Coverage of Innovative Technology (MCIT) rule a second time was controversial, but CMS’s Tamara Syrek Jensen vowed that the agency has made no final decision. Jensen acknowledged that the agency has not foreclosed a full-blown rescission of the MCIT proposal, a not-implausible outcome given the prospect that legislation in the works in the House Energy and Commerce Committee could render the rule moot.
The Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC) has been hard at work on the Make CAPA Cool program in an effort to beef up device makers’ corrective and preventive action (CAPA) programs. Kathryn Merrill, regulatory program director for Dublin-based Medtronic plc, said on an April 26 webinar that participants in the program have shaved CAPA times from 381 days to as few as 63 days, an improvement that industry hopes will ward off warning letters and product quality issues.
The latest global regulatory news, changes and updates affecting medical devices and technologies, including: MDIC accepting applications for the ASC pilot study.
Computer system validation (CSV) has been the source of considerable drag on device makers’ efforts to realize value derived from investments in the company’s technology base, but this long-standing issue is finally drawing some much-needed attention.
The U.S. FDA has been easing gently down the road of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory decision-making, and the case of the Watchman left atrial appendage device is instructive in this regard. Robert Shipley, of Boston Scientific Corp. (BSX), said on webinar hosted by the Advanced Medical Technology Association that the FDA changed gears and agreed to a registry for a post-approval study for the first generation Watchman, but added that the use of registry data and other RWE for approval of a next-generation device is as yet more aspirational than practicable.
