In response to the news of reported layoffs at the U.S. FDA over the weekend, Advanced Medical Association president and CEO Scott Whitaker said in press release that these “significant job cuts could have a very negative impact on patient care in this country.”
Medicare coverage of digital mental health therapies has traditionally been lacking, but the final Medicare physician fee schedule for 2025 added three new codes to deal with the coverage gap.
The U.S. biopharma and med-tech industries are adding their voice to that of Gilead Sciences Inc. in urging the California Supreme Court to review the Gilead Tenofovir Cases, which seek to hold the drug company liable for how and when it developed its pipeline of HIV drugs.
Medical device companies and trade associations alike have been clamoring for some time for a leaner path to Medicare coverage for their more novel product offerings, a message that may be gaining traction.
The U.S. FDA’s final guidance for premarket submissions for device software functions serves as a much needed overwrite of a badly outdated policy but includes some significant changes over the legacy guidance. There are also a few changes between the 2021 draft and the 2023 final guidance, however, such as a call for more details about how software anomalies were discovered and what a root cause analysis would suggest about the origin of the anomaly.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has once again waded into the question of whether medical devices should be included in the agency’s right-to-repair discussion, most recently in an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking ostensibly titled for energy labeling. The Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance (MITA) pushed back on the proposal by pointing to the draft’s required disclosure of proprietary information about a medical device system, a provision MITA said might detract from patient safety.
The U.S. CMS has finalized the physician fee rule for calendar year 2023, a document that imposes an across-the-board pay cut of approximately 4.5% for physician Medicare services. However, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) blasted the final rule’s failure to provide what they believe are appropriate rates for cardiac ablation services, a position backed by two med-tech trade associations in their comments to the docket for the draft rule.
The Verifying Accurate Leading-edge IVCT Development (VALID) Act has been floating around Capitol Hill for the past four years, but was once again left by the wayside when Congress passed the latest round of U.S. FDA user fee legislation. Scott Whitaker, president and CEO of the Advanced Medical Technology Association, said in a press briefing that the prospects for the legislation dim considerably if Congress does not pass the VALID Act by the end of the calendar year, raising the prospect that the FDA will act unilaterally to engage in rulemaking to deal with regulation of lab-developed tests.
The U.S. FDA has finally unveiled the fifth edition of the device user fee program (MDUFA V), and some of the performance measures remain unchanged from MDUFA IV, such as that the FDA will process 95% of 510(k) filings within 90 days.