In a regulatory round-up, the U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency opened a survey regarding in-house device manufacturing, the EU Notified Bodies staffed up last year and the Singapore Health Sciences Authority and the Hong Kong Department of Health agreed to share information.
The European Association for Medical Devices of Notified Bodies has issued its survey of member NBs for 2023, which includes data that suggest a diminishing appetite for inspections under the Medical Device Single Audit Program. However, the more concerning metric is that the gap between applications for new or renewed medical devices and the number of completed applications continues to widen, a gap that stood at nearly 10,000 such applications at the end of calendar year 2023.
Regulation of medical devices is always a messy and complicated task, but that has proven to be particularly true of the European Union’s (EU) Medical Device Regulation (MDR). Thanks largely to problems with the capacity of notified bodies (NBs) to review renewals of existing CE marks, patients in the EU may experience a significant dearth of medical devices over the next couple of years, a nightmare scenario that has all stakeholders scrambling for solutions.
Medtech Europe has on several occasions given voice to concerns about the drawn-out overhaul of the European Union’s medical device regulation but has come up with a new set of recommendations to break the regulatory logjam.
The European Commission’s (EC’s) Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety recently published a survey of notified bodies. This was conducted between April and May 2023, eliciting responses from all 39 notified bodies designated under the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and 10 Notified bodies designated under the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR).
Bringing notified bodies (NBs) into a med-tech regulatory system has proven to be no mean feat in the European Union, but the U.K. Medicines and Health Care Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) seems not to suffer from such impediments. The agency just added several in vitro diagnostic (IVD) technological areas to the roster of tests that can be reviewed by UL International UK, an addition that will help ensure patients can obtain the tests they need.
The European Union’s (EU) Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) drew a fair amount of criticism when it was first released, but Team-NB, the association of notified bodies (NBs) for the EU, has weighed in with some less than flattering observations. The group’s position paper on the legislation said that the act would not only up-classify some artificial intelligence algorithms to a higher risk class but would also resurrect the backlog of applications because of burdensome new requirements for NBs, thus exacerbating an existing crisis of med tech availability in the EU.
The U.K. is mulling over whether to recognize U.S. FDA approvals of medical devices as part of moves to accelerate the implementation of its post-Brexit regulatory system.
The European Commission has given in to the increasing pressure and alarm from member states and is moving to extend the deadlines for implementing the 2017 Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and the In Vitro Devices Regulation (IVDR).
