The controversy over U.S. Medicare coverage of breakthrough devices is far from over as an administrative matter, but the House of Representatives is prepared to statutorily force the issue with a new bill that enjoys bipartisan support. The Ensuring Patient Access to Critical Breakthrough Products Act of 2023 provides instant Medicare coverage upon FDA clearance or approval of the device, a feature of previous policy proposals that the CMS has found administratively problematic.
The U.S. FDA’s December 2022 draft guidance for human factors (HF) information in medical device premarket filings is a complete do-over of a previous draft guidance from 2016, but the reaction from industry has been anything but cheerful. Several observers, including the Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA), hammered the new draft guidance for its introduction of the concept of a critical task due to the expansive effect that would have on the need for human factors studies for medical devices.
The U.S. FDA’s 2018 program for voluntary malfunction summary reporting (VMSR) was intended to ease the burden for both industry and the agency regarding low-risk malfunctions associated with a limited set of device types. However, a new draft guidance on the subject drew criticism from two trade associations for being administratively cumbersome, suggesting the guidance will need considerable cleaning up before presentation in final form.
Beginning July 1, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration will allow medicines containing the psychedelic substances psilocybin and MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine) to be prescribed by authorized psychiatrists for certain mental health conditions.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has once again waded into the question of whether medical devices should be included in the agency’s right-to-repair discussion, most recently in an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking ostensibly titled for energy labeling. The Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance (MITA) pushed back on the proposal by pointing to the draft’s required disclosure of proprietary information about a medical device system, a provision MITA said might detract from patient safety.
The U.S. CMS has finalized the physician fee rule for calendar year 2023, a document that imposes an across-the-board pay cut of approximately 4.5% for physician Medicare services. However, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) blasted the final rule’s failure to provide what they believe are appropriate rates for cardiac ablation services, a position backed by two med-tech trade associations in their comments to the docket for the draft rule.
Medical device manufacturers have railed against payers’ prior authorization practices for years, but the U.S. Congress seems poised to finally address the issue, at least in the context of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. The House of Representatives has passed the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2021, a development that drew the applause of both the Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) and the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), a clear display of the broad support enjoyed by the legislation.
President Joseph Biden signed into law the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, a bill that calls for investment of $280 billion overall into the development and manufacturing of semiconductor products and which should ease the crunch on these products for medical device manufacturers. However, some have estimated that bringing new production capacity online can take three to five years, suggesting that the med-tech industry will need to continue to devise workarounds to the current supply crunch for the immediate future.
A committee of the U.S. House of Representatives is moving forward with a bill that would extend Medicare telehealth provisions for two years after the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency, but the legislation lacks features to deal with fraud and abuse.
The U.S. FDA’s latest draft guidance for premarket cybersecurity considerations expands considerably on the previous edition, and suggests that the manufacturer’s cybersecurity responsibilities include security in a health care facility’s network.
