The legislation that would renew a number of FDA user fee programs, the Food and Drug Amendments Act (FDA Act) of 2022, has passed the first legislative hurdle in a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives, but there are several issues with the bill. According to members of the subcommittee, the issues include an absence of provisions for medical device servicing, and the absence of legislation for FDA regulation of lab-developed tests (LDTs), issues that are unlikely to be resolved before the legislation is passed out of the House.

The legislation that would reauthorize the U.S. FDA’s user fee programs is now in the works in the House of Representatives, but the legislation is fairly lean when considering the number of issues facing the agency.

The bipartisan PREVENT Pandemics Act, which seeks to put into U.S. law many of the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, marked its first milestone March 15, with the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee sending it to the full Senate with a do-pass recommendation on a 20-2 vote.

The Biden administration sees the $15.6 billion just provided by Congress as inadequate funding for the pandemic, particularly given the administration’s new test-to-treat initiative, and will continue to press Congress for the remaining $6.9 billion requested by the White House, said Tom Inglesby, senior advisor for the White House COVID response team, at the American Clinical Laboratory Association annual meeting.

Over the course of the past two years, two presidential administrations and the U.S. Congress have set considerable sums of money aside for testing for the COVID-19 pandemic, but reports of shortages of tests have prompted a response from Capitol Hill.

The Verifying Accurate Leading-edge IVCT Development (VALID) Act seems poised for passage in 2022, a bit of welcome relief for those stuck in the regulatory twilight world of the lab-developed test (LDT). However, Carly McWilliams, director of regulatory policy for North America for Roche Inc., said recently at the recent Food and Drug Law Institute enforcement meeting that the VALID Act is likely to leave the question of a user fee schedule for a future Congress, given that the associated rulemaking, guidance development and compliance activities are likely to consume the better part of, if not the entirety of, the next five years.

Makers of vitro diagnostics (IVDs) are facing several significant challenges in the next few years, thanks to existing and impending revisions to a number of regulatory frameworks. There are other considerations that are adding to the headwinds, such as a poor patent protection environment in the U.S., the net effect of which is to make life unusually miserable for developers of these tests.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has withdrawn its August 2020 rescission of the FDA’s authority to regulate lab-developed tests (LDTs), a reversal predicated on the need for additional testing capacity for the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the non-COVID implications are not clear as the FDA is not widely seen as having the capacity to regulate LDTs for non-pandemic purposes, while pending legislation would dramatically overhaul the agency’s approach to LDT regulation, making the current regulatory environment an unstable environment at best. The FDA accompanied the announcement with a statement that the emphasis at the agency is on tests that do not require that the patient sample be sent to a lab for processing.

The issue of FDA regulation of lab-developed tests (LDTs) has been percolating for a number of years, but the Verifying Leading-edge IVCT development (VALID) Act of 2021 appears to offer the solution. Several stakeholders, including Jeff Allen, president and CEO of Friends of Cancer Research, are eager to see the reforms come through quickly, given the increasingly vital role that tests such as companion diagnostics play in the care of patients facing potentially deadly diseases.