All Clarivate websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.

More information on our cookie policy.

BioWorld. Link to homepage.

Clarivate
  • BioWorld
  • BioWorld MedTech
  • BioWorld Asia
  • BioWorld Science
  • Data Snapshots
    • BioWorld
    • BioWorld MedTech
  • Special reports
    • Aging
    • Biosimilars
    • Artificial intelligence
    • Coronavirus
    • IVDs on the rise
    • Science '22 in Review
    • Top Biopharma Trends of 2022
    • Top Med-tech Trends of 2022
    • Premium reports
      • BioWorld Financings Reports
      • Disease Incidence & Prevalence Summaries

BioWorld. Link to homepage.

  • sign in
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Subscribe
BioWorld - Sunday, March 26, 2023
Home » Blogs » BioWorld Perspectives » Drug quality from a patient’s perspective

BioWorld Perspectives
BioWorld Perspectives RSS FeedRSS

BioWorld / Oncology

Drug quality from a patient’s perspective

Sep. 10, 2017
By Mari Serebrov
No Comments

Mari's blog pic recallDirt. Excrement. Glass. Hair. Insects. Mold. Rodent infestation. Scouring pad fibers. Unknown particulates. They’re words too often mentioned in FDA warning letters that describe manufacturing conditions for supposedly sterile drugs.

A few years ago when I was a cancer patient hooked up to an I.V. drip for three to four hours every two weeks, I found reading those warning letters a horrifying experience. With a cocktail of generic and brand drugs coming from who knows where being pumped into the port resting a few inches from my heart, I cringed at the thought of what might be entering my vein. Especially when a company excused the scouring pad fibers and insect pieces as being “within the acceptable range.”

Yes, I knew the FDA inspected manufacturing facilities, but it gave me little comfort. Those inspections could be few and far between, given the agency’s limited resources and its expanding responsibilities across the world. According to the Government Accountability Office, one-third of foreign manufacturing plants and 14 percent of the plants in the U.S. had never been inspected. And it can take the FDA months or even years to become aware of and respond to unsanitary manufacturing conditions. Thus, I wasn’t 100 percent confident about the quality of the saline, steroids and chemo drugs dripping into my port.

Before chemo began, I did my research. I read the oncologist’s printouts on every drug he planned to use. I found more information online. I asked my oncologist questions and sought out second opinions from nationally recognized cancer experts on potential side effects and contraindications.

But there was one thing I couldn’t do – protect myself from a contaminated drug. There was nothing to tell me who had made the API or which manufacturing plants had produced the finished drugs I was being given. I had no idea if those plants had been inspected within the past decade, if they had addressed shortcomings the inspectors pointed out or if they had outstanding warning letters citing serious quality problems. And if the FDA issued a safety alert involving a specific manufacturer and batch or lot numbers, I wouldn’t know whether it should be a cause for alarm.

I could only trust.

Trust that someone in my doctor’s office had been informed of the alert and diligently checked the inventory, before I arrived for my infusion or shot. Trust that the FDA had done a recent inspection at the facilities making my drugs. Trust that it had already acted on any issues it found. (As BioWorld has reported, it can be up to a year before the FDA takes action against manufacturing plants with serious problems.) Trust that the drug companies took those issues seriously and were forthcoming with problems that had come up since their last inspection. Trust that the employees at the manufacturing plants knew, and cared, that my life was literally in their hands.

Ironically, while I was on chemo, the FDA put out a notice about a recall of certain organic frozen meals containing spinach that may have been contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes, an organism that can be fatal for people with weakened immune systems. In other words, people like me.

Because I had the brand, the name of the manufacturer, bar codes, lot numbers and expiration dates, I knew the recall could affect me. I had two of those meals in my freezer. In fact, I had been planning to have one of them for dinner that night. Instead, my husband returned the dinners to the store, which had just posted signs about the recall in its frozen foods section for everybody to see.

Were it so with drugs. . . .

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Popular Stories

  • Today's news in brief

    BioWorld
    BioWorld briefs for March 24, 2023.
  • Today's news in brief

    BioWorld MedTech
    BioWorld MedTech briefs for March 24, 2022.
  • Kirill Pevzner and Eran Seger - Protai

    AI drug discovery startup Protai raises $12M in seed funding

    BioWorld
    Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered drug discovery startup Protai Bio Ltd. raised $12 million in additional seed funding, bringing the total amount to $20...
  • Pfizer-Seagen logos on puzzle pieces

    Pfizer to buy Seagen for $43B

    BioWorld
    Pfizer Inc.’s appetite for acquisitions shows no signs of abating as it announced this morning its plan to acquire biotech Seagen Inc. for a whopping $43 billion...
  • In war against T1D onset, Tzield-bearer Provention’s comrade Sanofi plans $2.9B takeover

    BioWorld
    Shares of Provention Bio Inc. (NASDAQ:PRVB) closed March 13 at $24.10, up $17.40, or 259%, after Wall Street learned that collaborator Sanofi SA intends to...
black cortellis ad

BioWorld Premium

Enjoy extended coverage for the most complete market view with BioWorld, BioWorld MedTech, and BioWorld Asia in a single, easy to access subscription.

Subscribe
  • BioWorld
    • Today's news
    • Analysis and data insight
    • Clinical
    • Data Snapshots
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Newco news
    • Opinion
    • Regulatory
    • Science
  • BioWorld MedTech
    • Today's news
    • Clinical
    • Data Snapshots
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Newco news
    • Opinion
    • Regulatory
    • Science
  • BioWorld Asia
    • Today's news
    • Analysis and data insight
    • Australia
    • China
    • Clinical
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Newco news
    • Regulatory
    • Science
  • BioWorld Science
    • Today's news
    • Biomarkers
    • Cancer
    • Conferences
    • Endocrine/Metabolic
    • Immune
    • Infection
    • Neurology/Psychiatric
    • Patents
  • More
    • About
    • Archives
    • Article reprints and permissions
    • Contact us
    • Cookie policy
    • Copyright notice
    • Data methodology
    • Podcasts
    • Privacy policy
    • Share your news with BioWorld
    • Staff
    • Terms of use
Follow Us

Copyright ©2023. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing