Whether it’s legislation calling for more transparency from pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) or hearings held in search of a new roadmap to modernize the U.S. drug supply chain, Congress is scrutinizing and looking to clamp down on the role PBMs are playing in raising drug prices.
A lot of eyes and ears were tuned to the U.S. Supreme Court’s March 27 argument in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi SA with its focus on how much enablement is necessary in broad genus patent claims.
Citing significant implications for patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease, as well as the broader public interest that’s at stake, the U.S. FTC filed an amicus brief in Sage Chemical Inc.’s district court challenge of Supernus Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s strategies to block generic competition of its injectable Parkinson’s drug, Apokyn (apomorphine).
While the FDA has yet to take a stance on whether risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) patents can be listed in its Orange Book, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit weighed in Feb. 24 with a decisive “no” when those patents only claim a system.
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to grant cert for a petition filed by Johnson & Johnson on behalf of its Ethicon subsidiary to review a case in California that will cost the company more than $300 million. The outcome highlights the differential hazards of advertising and promotion in various U.S. states, with California state law allowing fines of up to $2,500 for each violation of state law, an amount that can quickly tally into the hundreds of millions.
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is launching an investigation into the importation from China of certain thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonists, products containing them and the manufacturing processes being used.
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) is launching an investigation into the importation from China of certain thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonists, products containing them and the manufacturing processes being used.
A federal court cut off efforts Feb. 6 to halt a U.S. program allowing prescription drug imports from Canada before the program gets off the ground. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a suit by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) and other organizations, saying that they lacked standing because neither they nor their members face “a concrete risk of harm from the inchoate importation program.”
As the FDA has in the past when a court issued an opinion it didn’t agree with, the U.S. agency is trying to limit the fallout from an appellate court ruling in Catalyst Pharmaceuticals Inc. vs. Becerra, which involved the breadth of orphan drug exclusivity, to that case alone.
Citing federal preemption, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit tossed multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving GSK plc’s labeling of Zofran, an antiemetic approved for postoperative use and in conjunction with chemo or radiation, but that is commonly used off-label in pregnancy.
