The ongoing controversy over the use of ethylene oxide (EtO) as a medical device sterilant has yielded a certification by the U.S. FDA for hydrogen peroxide as an alternative category A sterilant. The news is a welcome bit of relief for industry and for patients as the Environmental Protection Agency still seems bent on imposing what some in industry see as draconian controls on EtO, which is still employed to sterilize half of all medical devices used in the U.S. each year.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has struggled to devise a final rule regarding regulation of ethylene oxide (EtO) after several years, a regulatory activity that has device makers concerned about domestic capacity for sterilization.
The U.S. FDA’s draft rule for regulation of lab-developed tests (LDTs) was a long time in coming, much longer than any legislative proposals to overhaul the agency’s regulatory mechanisms for these tests. Nonetheless, Scott Whitaker, president and CEO of the Advanced Medical Technology Association (Advamed), believes that the FDA draft rule is likely to prompt Congress to pass the Verifying Accurate, Leading-edge IVCT development (VALID) Act, a development that would truncate an FDA final rule that would almost certainly face litigation.
The U.S. FDA recognized several new standards for sterilization of medical devices as part of an effort to reduce the use of ethylene oxide (EtO) for this purpose. While the recognition may stimulate adoption of alternative methods, Congress is applying yet more pressure on the EPA to act more decisively in regulating EtO, thus amplifying pressure on a system that device makers believe is already under stress.
Sotera Health Holdings LLC has finalized a $408 million settlement for litigation over the company’s use of ethylene oxide (EtO) at a Sterigenics facility in Willowbrook, Ill., although litigation is still pending in connection with sites in other U.S. states. The news comes as med-tech trade associations register their disappointment with an EPA proposed rule for EtO that both the Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) and the Advanced Medical Technology Association (Advamed) argue would crimp availability of sterilization capacity, which would in turn create shortages of medical devices and supplies that are desperately needed by patients.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a more stringent set of requirements for the use of ethylene oxide for sterilization of a variety of products, including medical devices, a proposal that is expected to increase the cost of operating these facilities.
Seemingly in response to the release of a proposed rule for ethylene oxide emissions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. FDA has released a second pilot program for device master files for sterilization of medical devices. This program is for single-use PMA devices only made by nine companies and allows the manufacturer or sterilizer to document the switch to radiation sterilization with an expedited review process.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a new set of requirements for control of emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO), a standard the agency claims will “slash” emissions by 80% per year. The problem for med-tech trade associations is that EPA expects that the abatements be implemented within 18 months, a pace that industry says is too aggressive and could lead to shortages of critical devices and products used in surgeries and other procedures.
The Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) has led the policy charge for smaller medical device manufacturers for decades, but each year brings its own unique set of hazards and opportunities. In an interview with BioWorld, MDMA President and CEO Mark Leahey said that while the Medicare policy for coverage of breakthrough devices has gone through some unanticipated twists and turns, that policy is not yet fixed and thus there is still some prospect that such a policy will not devolve into a stew of leftovers drawn from existing coverage mechanisms.
Sotera Health Services LLC, the parent company of Sterigenics US LLC, has agreed to pay $408 million to settle more than 870 lawsuits pending against the company in Illinois as a means of moving past the specter of ongoing litigation over Sterigenics’ use of ethylene oxide (EtO) for contract medical device sterilization. The settlement may open the doors to litigation over other sterilization plants’ use of the sterilant, constituting an industry-wide attack on device sterilization services that may crimp supplies of devices that are not candidates for other methods of sterilization.
