Regulatory harmonization and reliance are the orders of the day at this year’s meeting of the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF), but that does not mean individual regulators are waiting for IMDRF to act on their own imperatives.
The International Medical Device Regulators Forum will meet in Washington in March 2024, a location which would seem to guarantee robust attendance. The meeting agenda includes an extensive amount of time for specialized regulatory pathways, an effort to promote the incentives for development of orphan and pediatric devices across the globe.
The U.S. FDA is still sorting through the feedback for its proposal to modestly align the Quality System Regulation with ISO 13485, but the agency has posted a draft four-year plan for regulatory harmonization that is substantially broader in scope than just quality management system considerations. While this proposal addresses a significant need for device makers working in multiple markets, the objectives include an assessment of at least nine non-FDA harmonization proposals by the end of fiscal year 2025, a clear indicator that harmonization will continue to be every bit the slog it has proven to be in recent years.
The U.S. FDA’s September 2022 guidance for clinical decision support (CDS) software was controversial the moment the agency posted the document, prompting the filing of a citizen’s petition five months later. The CDS Coalition has penned a June 8 letter to FDA commissioner Robert Califf in an effort to draw a reaction from the agency, but the letter was accompanied by a summary of an analysis of CDS software with a machine learning (ML) component that suggests that such products that are in development may have to be reconsidered.
The International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) has posted a guidance that spells out the use of a common document for regulatory review for member regulatory authorities, a mechanism that might ease the lives of manufacturers across the globe.
Anvisa, Brazil´s health care surveillance agency, issued new regulations for the registration of medical devices as it works to harmonize its own rules with international standards and integrate its medtech industry with those of other countries in the region.
The U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is still considering a drastic overhaul of the 2002 medical device regulatory framework, but may have sent a signal that its new framework won’t deviate too far from established regulatory approaches.
The U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is still considering a drastic overhaul of the 2002 medical device regulatory framework, but may have sent a signal that its new framework won’t deviate too far from established regulatory approaches. The agency reported June 16 that it has signed on with both the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) for drugs and the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) for devices, providing members of both industries with at least some modest confidence that access to the 67 million strong U.K. market won’t suffer from a new set of unique regulatory hurdles.
The International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) has posted a draft guidance for cybersecurity practices for legacy devices, a nod to the number of older devices that are difficult to secure. This document is a follow-up to a standing IMDRF guidance that spans the product life cycle, but which apparently left stakeholders with a few questions.
Regulatory harmonization is seen as vital to the development of markets for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), but there is some variation in the terminology used to describe these algorithms. The International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) has posted a document that includes some definitions for ML terms such as unsupervised machine learning, a key development if regulations across the globe are to avoid a hopeless state of balkanization.