The U.K. is mulling over whether to recognize U.S. FDA approvals of medical devices as part of moves to accelerate the implementation of its post-Brexit regulatory system.

The conviction and sentencing of Elizabeth Holmes and Sunny Balwani of Theranos Corp. might be seen as an example of retribution for testing technology that didn’t exist and thus endangered patients, but that perception doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has developed a number of policies related to corporate misconduct over the past couple of decades, some of which were stood up only to be reversed a short time later.

The U.S. FDA reported that the post-approval study (PAS) for the Impella RP by Abiomed Inc. of Danvers, Mass., demonstrated that the device performed well for patients who would have been eligible for the pivotal study, providing a 69.7% survival rate at 30 days after device explant.

The U.S. House of Representatives has resurrected the Pre-approval Information Exchange (PIE) Act, a bill that would bolster the prospects for drugs and devices by improving communications with payers prior to U.S. FDA clearance or approval of the product.

The U.S. House of Representatives has resurrected the Pre-approval Information Exchange (PIE) Act, a bill that would bolster the prospects for drugs and devices by improving communications with payers prior to U.S. FDA clearance or approval of the product. The supporters of the legislation, a bipartisan group of members of the House Energy and Commerce (E&C) Committee, see the legislation as essential as a means of overcoming some of the ambiguities in a 2018 FDA guidance pertaining to communications between manufacturers and payers, and thus a replay of one of the more interesting methods of critiquing an FDA guidance.