The year 2025 will go down in med-tech history as remarkable for a number of things, but manufacturers doing business in the EU might be forgiven for thinking that it was a year for correction of self-inflicted wounds, even if those corrections won’t arrive in full form until 2026.
The European Union’s struggles with regulations for devices and in vitro diagnostics seem virtually endless, but the European Commission floated a series of changes that would present a significant reset of both regulations. One of the more sweeping changes would be to exempt medical technologies from much of the text of the Artificial Intelligence Act, a move that would ease the drag on AI-based technologies in the EU.
The European Commission (EC) posted a call for evidence regarding its intent to “simplify EU rules” for medical technology with a comment period that began Sept. 8, 2025. Stakeholders almost immediately flooded the docket with recommendations.
In a regulatory round-up, the U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency opened a survey regarding in-house device manufacturing, the EU Notified Bodies staffed up last year and the Singapore Health Sciences Authority and the Hong Kong Department of Health agreed to share information.
The issues facing the EU’s Medical Device Regulation and the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation are the stuff of legend, but the EU’s notified body group, TEAM NB, has proposed a mechanism to deal with some of the administrative problems.
New guidance by the Medical Device Coordination Group spells out many of the routine aspects of compliance with the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation, but test developers should remain aware of the tripwires in connection with modifications to both the test and the test’s performance studies.
The European Association of Medical Device Notified Bodies, also known as Team NB, has proposed the issuance of a conditional CE certificate for medical devices and in vitro diagnostics, a concept said to have existed in the legacy regulations as well. The question for industry is whether this mechanism can be used to aid in the backlog of devices under the Medical Device Regulation (MDR), a problem that is still front and center in the EU eight years after passage of the index legislation.
The EU’s Medical Device Coordination Group issued a guidance on the types of products that qualify as in vitro diagnostics (IVDs), including some important distinctions even in instances in which a given analyte is the subject of two tests.
Regulatory overhauls are never a simple affair, but the med tech industry ran into an amorphous, ennui-inducing mess in dealing with the EU Medical Device Regulation almost immediately. Even though the underlying legislation passed in 2017, the MDR impasse continued to impede innovation on the continent – a problem that might be only partly resolved in 2025.
