The European Commission’s (EC’s) Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety recently published a survey of notified bodies. This was conducted between April and May 2023, eliciting responses from all 39 notified bodies designated under the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and 10 Notified bodies designated under the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR).
The EU’s In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) has not yet been fully implemented, but Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Authority (TGA) is wasting no time attempting to harmonize with the IVDR.
The recent decision by the EU to delay the implementation dates for the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) initiative is having ripple effects across the globe as other regulatory jurisdictions amend their policies to keep pace. The U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) have both revised their strategies to align with the latest MDR delay, giving devices that will remain available in the EU a similar extension in the U.K. and Australia.
Device makers doing business in the EU finally have official word that the new implementation dates for the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) are in force, offering some vital breathing room for products already on the market. However, manufacturers that wish to obtain a new certificate for their legacy devices still have a lot of work to do as they must file at least a preliminary application for these devices with a notified body (NB) by May 26, 2024, not a mean feat given the crunch on notified bodies operating in the EU.
The European Council applied its seal of approval to a proposal to extend the deadlines for the Medical Device Regulation (MDR), providing industry some critical breathing room to obtain certification for devices brought to market under the legacy Medical Device Directive (MDD).
The European Parliament (EP) has voted to affirm the proposal by the European Commission (EC) to extend the compliance timelines for the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) in an urgent vote that eliminated any chance of debate. The vote was a landslide, coming in at 564 votes in support and three nays.
The European Union’s (EU) Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) drew a fair amount of criticism when it was first released, but Team-NB, the association of notified bodies (NBs) for the EU, has weighed in with some less than flattering observations. The group’s position paper on the legislation said that the act would not only up-classify some artificial intelligence algorithms to a higher risk class but would also resurrect the backlog of applications because of burdensome new requirements for NBs, thus exacerbating an existing crisis of med tech availability in the EU.
The European Commission has given in to the increasing pressure and alarm from member states and is moving to extend the deadlines for implementing the 2017 Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and the In Vitro Devices Regulation (IVDR).
The problem with notified body (NB) capacity in the European Union is well known, but a recent survey of NBs suggests that more than 17,000 certificates for medical devices and active implanted devices issued under the legacy regulation are set to expire by the end of 2024. More troubling might be the fact that the number of standing applications dwarfs the number of completed applications by a ratio of more than four to one, a gap that continues to grow as calendar year 2022 unwinds.
Implementation of the new regulations for medical devices and in vitro diagnostics in the EU have presented a number of problems, including a serious crunch in the availability of notified bodies (NBs) to review premarket filings.
