The coverage with evidence development (CED) process employed by the U.S. Medicare program may suffer from underutilization, but the authors of a new article in Value in Health see the attendant problems as administrative in nature. The issues include, but are not limited to, a lack of predictability as to when a CED study would be required for coverage of a medical device.
In denying Medicaid patients with sickle cell disease or transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia access to Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s fertility preservation program, which is intended to counteract a side effect of the company’s gene-editing therapy, Casgevy, “the federal government now stands as the barrier between thousands of predominantly Black Americans and the necessary medical care that would protect their basic right to have biological children,” Vertex said in a lawsuit filed July 15.
The U.S. Medicare outpatient draft for 2025 is rich with applications for pass-through payment, but the draft also would boost payment for radiopharmaceuticals, a proposal that drew the applause of industry and physicians alike. The outpatient draft for CY 2025 tackles the implications of some new technologies for the pass-through payment program, but nestled in the draft rule is a proposal to pay separately for diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals.