The draft version of the U.S. Medicare national coverage analysis for blood-based biomarker tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) engendered a large body of support, but several stakeholders recommended that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) avoid prescriptiveness regarding the sensitivity and specificity for any tests that would be covered under the policy.

The annual publication of the draft Medicare physician fee schedule (MPFS) is an event, but this year’s draft has drawn substantial criticism from across the board, despite the promise of more coverage of telehealth. The Medical Imaging & Technology Association (MITA) and a coalition of surgeons have blasted the draft as a hazard to patient access to both evaluation and management (E/M) services and surgical procedures, both of which present substantial headwinds for the medical device industry.

Syncardia Systems LLC, of Tucson, Ariz., has petitioned the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to drop the coverage with evidence development (CED) mandate for artificial hearts, stating that multiple studies have demonstrated that artificial hearts meet the reasonable and necessary standard. Syncardia said its temporary Total Artificial Heart (TAH-t) should thus be available “unencumbered by the existing requirement for evidence development,” a change that could modestly bolster utilization and sales of these devices.

The Medicare coverage memo for next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) was reopened to allow for NGS testing for other than late-stage cancers, but stakeholders are urging the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to allow repeat testing, another change that would considerably boost utilization.