Headlines the world over have been dominated by the resilience of the Ukrainian military – but the country’s clinical research body said that amid the chaos of war, trials are carrying on despite the destruction of hospitals and civilian infrastructure. As revealed by BioWorld, big pharma sponsors are putting clinical studies on hold in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus as the war plays havoc with medical supplies and the normal functioning of society.
Big pharma sponsors of clinical trials in Ukraine are putting studies on hold in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus as the conflict continues into its third week. As revealed by BioWorld last week, hundreds of clinical trials were being conducted in the two countries at the time Russian President Vladimir Putin gave orders to invade Ukraine on Feb. 20.
Russia and Belarus are being frozen out of international science, with universities and research institutions across Europe suspending joint research projects and calling a halt to the formation of any new collaborations, following the invasion of Ukraine. Initial sanctions announced by European governments called for the severing of direct institution-to-institution links only, with many universities counseling individual researchers to maintain personal relations with Russian peers.
The indirect impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the life sciences sector continues to grow, as the West responds with more and more sanctions against Russia. In one of the latest moves, the European Commission announced March 4 that it is suspending cooperation with Russian entities in research, science and innovation.
It’s been seven years since economist Jim O’Neill began his review on antimicrobial resistance, commissioned by the U.K. government to find ways to encourage development of badly needed new antibiotics. Since then, the pandemic has produced radical changes in society and forced pharma to refocus its R&D priorities at short notice. But COVID-19 has also raised awareness about the devastating effect that rogue pathogens can pose to society, and there are now serious moves to prevent a global catastrophe caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria.
A U.S. federal jury convicted Charles Lieber, the former chair of Harvard University’s chemistry and chemical biology department, on charges related to lying to federal authorities about his affiliation with China’s Thousand Talents Plan and the Wuhan University of Technology, as well as failing to report the income he received from the institute.
A U.S. federal jury convicted Charles Lieber, the former chair of Harvard University’s chemistry and chemical biology department, on charges related to lying to federal authorities about his affiliation with China’s Thousand Talents Plan and the Wuhan University of Technology (WUT), as well as failing to report the income he received from the institute.
Voot Yin, co-founder and chief scientific officer of the Bar Harbor, Maine-based Novo Biosciences Inc., reached a settlement with U.S. Health and Human Services’ Office of Research Integrity over allegations that he faked data while conducting government-funded research at the Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory in Maine.
Heralded as a potential turning point for U.S. innovation in the 21st century, the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act, S. 1260, is a big step closer to becoming law. The Senate voted 68-32 June 8 to pass the sweeping $250 billion bipartisan bill intended to give the U.S. an edge over China when it comes to innovation and investment in several critical industries, including artificial intelligence, biotechnology and quantum computing.
Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology see a future where long-lasting hydrogel injections replace eye drops and surgery in the management of glaucoma, the most common cause of irreversible blindness in the world. The treatment would be delivered every six months, in line with glaucoma patients’ regularly scheduled visits to the ophthalmologist.
