Citing significant concerns of bacterial contamination, the FDA urged consumers and health care providers to stop using specific lots of SD Biosensor Inc.’s Pilot COVID-19 At-Home Tests, which were distributed by Roche Diagnostics Systems Inc. The agency warned that direct contact with the contaminated liquid solution could pose safety issues as well as impair the test’s performance.
Avanos Medical Inc. recalled 1,000 units of two of its Ballard Access suction systems for use in clearing artificial airways in neonatal and pediatric patients because of multiple complaints of cracked device manifolds. The recall affects 1,000 units distributed in the U.S. between October 2022 and January 2023, but this is the second recall of Avanos products in less than a year.
Draeger Inc., of Telford, Pa., reported a recall of several lines of positive airway pressure (PAP) and other ventilation products in connection with problems seen in the adhesive used on breathing circuit components. Draeger said it has no reports of adverse events in connection with separation of the affected components during ventilation processes but has completed its testing of the corrective action and is working to replace the affected devices.
The U.S. FDA reported yet another recall of intra-aortic balloon pumps made by Datascope Corp., an unfortunate development for patients in need of these devices that are still on the FDA’s list of devices that are in short supply. While no injuries or deaths have been reported in connection with the coiled connector cables that prompted the recall, the need to replace these cables could further crimp units needed to sustain patients during cardiac surgery procedures.
The U.S. FDA reported that Baxter International Inc. issued an Urgent Medical Device Correction for its Life2000 ventilation systems in response to reports of potential patient oxygen desaturation events when connected to a third-party oxygen concentrator.
GE Healthcare Technologies Inc. reported a recall of several systems in its nuclear medicine line of high-end imaging systems for two potential issues that could lead to the collapse of a detector weighing more than half a ton onto the patient. According to the U.S. FDA listing for the recall, no injuries or fatalities have been reported in connection with these issues, but the announcement resurrects an episode from 2013 in which a patient in New York lost his life when a nuclear imaging camera collapsed during an imaging procedure.
Royal Philips NV released a grim annual report for 2022 that showed a little willingness to share the pain of an unabashedly awful year for the health tech company, which has been plagued by a recall fiasco that has bled into multiple years. Shareholders lost much of their investment with the company’s more than 60% drop in market value in 2022, 10,000 employees faced job loss and all current members of top management waived their annual incentive payouts. Notably, former CEO Frans van Houten, who was replaced in October and oversaw the ill-fated recall, did not waive his bonus of $208,370.
The U.S. FDA has posted or updated several recalls in the second half of January 2023, such as the class I recall of Mahurkar hemodialysis catheters distributed by Medtronic plc., reported Jan. 30. This recall is associated with two injuries but no fatalities to date, but the potential for mixing of venous and arterial blood has forced Medtronic to request that its customers quarantine any unused catheter kits, which could be a substantial amount of product given the nearly 23,000 units are affected by the recall.
Royal Philips NV revealed plans to cut a further 6,000 jobs on top of the 4,000 announced in October as it sought to stabilize the business and improve its operational performance going into 2023. In total, the company will reduce its workforce by about 13%. Philip’s fourth quarter results came in ahead of consensus expectations, but the company still posted a loss of €105 million (US$108.2 million).
The U.S. FDA’s 510(k) program is yet again under assault, this time from the authors of a Jan. 10 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). The authors’ primary point seems to be that any 510(k) devices that recite a predicate that is the subject of at least three recalls are themselves more likely than average to be the subject of a recall, although there was no discernible association between recall status and technological differences between the predicate and the follow-on devices.
