The FDA’s July 27 webinar on medical device servicing and remanufacturing lent some clarity to the terms of a recent draft guidance on the subject, but there are several overarching policy concerns. The FDA’s Joshua Silverstein said on the webinar that the agency sees servicing as a type of manufacturing, a view that is contradicted by the Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance, which indicated earlier this year that third-party servicers are probably not subject to the regulations applied to manufacturers.

Becton, Dickinson and Co. (BD) notched its sixth tuck-in buy of the year, acquiring long-time partner and resorbable polymer maker Tepha Inc. for an undisclosed sum. The deal will facilitate expansion of BD’s surgical mesh offerings and drive growth in new areas of soft tissue repair, reconstruction and regeneration. Wall Street gave the Tepha deal a thumbs up. After hitting a high of $256.32 Tuesday, BD shares (NYSE:BDX) maintained a strong beat, closing up 2.11 at $254.69.

The FDA advisory hearing for the Transmedics Organ Care System (OCS) resulted in a unanimous vote in favor of the OCS’s safety and efficacy numbers, although there will be a considerable post-approval study requirement. The company was able to overcome a number of problems with the pivotal study that might otherwise have tanked the application, such as the lack of blinding of transplant surgeons, which the FDA said could have biased the determination of whether a liver was acceptable for transplant.

The FDA is working toward a rewrite of its Quality Systems Regulation (QSR) and ISO 13485, the internationally recognized quality management standard, but that project has yet to produce a draft rule despite several years of effort. The FDA’s Vidya Gopal highlighted the differences between the two approaches to questions such as management responsibility and staff resources, just two of many differences that will prove difficult to reconcile in any regulatory harmonization effort.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) had previously reported it would more tightly scrutinize mergers and acquisitions with an eye toward the impact on competition, and voted July 21 to expand its authority to review these activities. The agency also voted to eliminate restrictions by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) on servicing of their devices, thus putting both drug and device makers on alert that much more rigorous FTC enforcement has arrived.

More than a decade after the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act became law and nearly six years after the first biosimilar launched in the U.S., the country’s first potential interchangeable is on deck awaiting an FDA decision.

The medical device development tool (MDDT) may come across as so much regulatory esoterica of little utility to most device makers, but that perspective might be unduly pessimistic. The FDA’s Edward Margerrison, director of the Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, said the agency is intent on making MDDTs as ordinary as possible to allow device makers to do what they do best, which is to focus on making the best device they can.

A proposed $26 billion global settlement could end the state-by-state opioid litigation in the U.S. for Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and three drug distributors. The attorneys general from several states announced the proposed agreement July 21 with J&J, Amerisource Bergen Drug Corp., Cardinal Health Inc. and McKesson Corp.