Payers had their hands full in 2025 dealing with the raft of medical technologies that came through the globe’s regulatory review processes, although the nature of many of those challenges were conventional. On the other hand, payers struggled to keep pace with both the volume of conventional devices and the novelty of AI-driven devices in 2025, a problem that will carry over into the coming year.
Then there were three. With the administration’s Dec. 19 announcement of most-favored-nation (MFN) pricing deals with nine more biopharmas, only three of the 17 companies on the receiving end of U.S. President Donald Trump’s July 31 MFN ultimatum have yet to finalize terms with the White House – Abbvie Inc., Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Two U.S. Medicare administrative contractors (MACs) have removed CPT code 6468 from their group 1 CPT codes, a move that may cut rates for implant of Inspire Medical Inc.'s flagship product, the Inspire hypoglossal nerve stimulator for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
Much has been made of the recent skyrocketing of Medicare spending on skin substitutes, but a new enforcement action by the U.S. Department of Justice might help to explain some of those spending increases.
Edwards Lifesciences Corp., of Irvine, Calif., petitioned the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to revise the Medicare coverage policy for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) devices on two points, the combination of which would make a big difference for TAVR devices across manufacturers. Edwards requested that CMS explicitly cover TAVR for asymptomatic aortic stenosis patients, a notion well supported by recent data, and bring an end to the coverage with evidence development mandate.
A group of eight Democratic senators is asking biopharma companies to spill the beans about their private most-favored-nation pricing deals with U.S. President Donald Trump. Led by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, the senators sent letters Dec. 11 to Astrazeneca plc, Eli Lilly and Co., Novo Nordisk A/S and Pfizer Inc. seeking the details of those deals. While it’s difficult to discern how the deals will benefit patients, it’s clear the companies stand to gain a lot from the agreements, the letter asserted.
The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has posted the home health final rule for calendar year 2026 and has established a framework for competitive bidding for products such as continuous glucose monitors, a move that is struggling to find support among stakeholders.
The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) rolled out negotiated costs of the second batch of drugs subject to such bargaining under the Inflation Reduction Act. Wall Street was not surprised to learn that the numbers amount to much greater cuts than the Biden administration managed for 2026. CMS said the adjusted maximum fair prices would have achieved 44% lower net spending had they been implemented in 2024 – 36% if forgiven discounts from the part D redesign of the Medicare prescription drug benefit are figured in. Fifteen drugs are listed.
The Office of Inspector General issued a report stating that the Medicare program could save “tens of millions of dollars” in a single year on continuous glucose monitors and associated supplies if the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services acted to apply price pressure on suppliers.
The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services will cover certain cardiac electrophysiology procedures in ambulatory surgical centers in 2026. This change which drew the support of both the Heart Rhythm Society and the American College of Cardiology, which could increase device utilization.