A U.S. district court slapped down a controversial Department of Health and Human Services rule that threatened the future of biopharma companies’ patient assistance programs, which are intended to help patients cover their out-of-pocket costs for pricy drugs.
Even though at least two different U.S. district courts have ruled that the 340B enforcement letters the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Health Resources and Services Administration has sent to biopharma companies violate the Administrative Procedures Act, the agency continues to send the letters, along with threats of civil money penalties, to companies that place restrictions on the 340B discounts to contract pharmacies.
Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) were in the spotlight at a May 5 U.S. Senate subcommittee hearing on fairness and transparency in the prescription drug market, but lawmakers indicated they need to turn up the klieg lights of the FTC to penetrate the black box of PBM operations.
The biopharma industry signed on to a new pledge to increase the availability of innovative drugs across the EU and shave months from the time patients in some EU member states must wait for access to new drugs. Members of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations committed to file for pricing and reimbursement in all EU countries as soon as possible and no later than two years after receiving central EU market authorization – if local systems allow it.
When it comes to lowering U.S. drug prices, Congress has a lot of options among the several bills that have been introduced in both the House and Senate over the years. But a deadlock between bipartisan measures and partisan proposals has reduced legislative action to mere talk. The deadlock, and the at times hyperbolic debate, continued in yet another congressional hearing March 16 on “the urgent need to lower drug prices in Medicare,” as the Senate Finance Committee billed it.
Over the past few years, China has been quick to make promises to improve its regulatory and patent schemes for biopharmaceuticals and medical devices in keeping with its World Trade Organization (WTO) commitments, but it’s been slow to fulfill those promises – at least in the eyes of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR).
Drug companies won another round in their battle with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) over how many contract pharmacies must be given the steep discounts dictated under the 340B drug pricing program aimed at helping public clinics and hospitals provide charity care.
Over the past few years, China has been quick to make promises to improve its regulatory and patent schemes for biopharmaceuticals and medical devices in keeping with its World Trade Organization (WTO) commitments, but it’s been slow to fulfill those promises – at least in the eyes of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR).
Even as the U.S. Congress continues to kick the can down the road on prescription drug pricing, pressure to finally confront the issue is increasing. But as lawmakers debate price controls via direct Medicare negotiations vs. innovation, along with inflationary caps on price increases, one factor often gets downplayed: the role biologics are playing in the country’s overall spend on prescription drugs. While generics account for 90% of the drugs prescribed in the U.S., the other 10% of drugs prescribed account for more than 80% of the annual spending, according to the Association for Accessible Medicines.
South Africa’s Competition Commission sent a warning this week to the biopharma industry when it announced that it is prosecuting Roche Holding AG for what it called excessive pricing of the company’s breast cancer drug, Herceptin, which is also marketed as Herclon in South Africa.
