The Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) reported the opening of a series of regional offices that focus on both administrative and research assignments, a development that may bolster cures and treatments for tough-to-treat conditions. However, the U.S. House and Senate have different ideas about how much money the agency will receive in 2024, casting a cloud of uncertainty over how many projects the agency will be able to finance in the twelve months that will start on Oct. 1, 2023.
The Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) reported the opening of a series of regional offices that focus on both administrative and research assignments, a development that may bolster cures and treatments for tough-to-treat conditions. However, the U.S. House and Senate have different ideas about how much money the agency will receive in 2024, casting a cloud of uncertainty over how many projects the agency will be able to finance in the twelve months that will start on Oct. 1, 2023.
The question of third-party litigation funding has been front and center for life science companies in recent years, with one of the key considerations a lack of transparency as to the source of the funding behind much of this litigation. That lack of transparency was front and center in the Sept. 13 hearing in the U.S. House of Representatives, but the tenor of the hearing made clear that some members of Congress will stand in opposition to any reforms even though the lack of transparency is widely seen as enabling meritless litigation.
While the U.S. FDA’s preclinical and clinical trial framework is generally well-suited to adapt to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in developing new drugs, its regulatory framework for medical devices that incorporate evolving AI leaves a lot to be desired, according to Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), the ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee.
Continuing its efforts to reduce prescription drug prices in the U.S., the Senate Finance Committee turned up the heat on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), voting overwhelmingly, 26-1, to send the bipartisan Modernizing and Ensuring PBM Accountability (MEPA) Act to the full Senate.
A day after a U.S. House committee, on a party-line vote, advanced two bills to reauthorize emergency preparedness programs, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee voted 17-3 July 20 to send its bipartisan reauthorization of the Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act to the Senate floor with a do-pass recommendation.
A committee of the U.S. House of Representatives met to review the Medicare coverage procedure for innovative drugs and devices, an event that seemed to gin up support for legislation that would help to streamline those processes. The problem for drug and device makers, however, may be that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
continues to labor under a flat appropriations picture that is eroding daily thanks to inflation.
The tension of clashing politics, policies and prescription drug pricing is coming to a head as U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) acts on his threat to hold presidential appointments in the health arena hostage until President Joe Biden commits to do more to bring down drug prices.
The floodgates have opened for challenges to the new U.S. drug price negotiation process laid out in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that was narrowly passed last year.
Rather than waiting on the courts to sort out the 340B dispute between the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and prescription drug manufacturers, a group of senators is looking for bipartisan legislative solutions that would infuse the drug discount program with more accountability, certainty, oversight and transparency.
