The U.S. FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research posted four warning letters to makers of HIV sample collection kits, an example of a shift in FDA enforcement in the IVD space that is still allowed after a historical loss in court.
Moving away from a one-size-fits-all approach, the U.S. FDA's CBER released details Jan. 11 about how it’s leveraging its growing experience with cell and gene therapies (CGTs) to exercise greater regulatory flexibility in chemical, manufacturing and control requirements for the products.
The U.S. FDA’s recent switch toward more routine use of generalist field investigators might be seen in some quarters as an attempt to do more with less, but a session on the topic at the Food and Drug Law Institute’s annual enforcement conference in Washington seems to suggest that this reversal of historic practice presents at least as many problems as solutions for industry.
The FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) will have its hands full with the roll-out of the overhauled quality management regulation, but this will have ripple effects on industry as well. Keisha Thomas, associate director for compliance and quality at CDRH, told an audience in Washington DC that risk management will be a big focus in FDA oversight and inspections in 2026, a point of emphasis that could lead to more routine compliance and enforcement action.
Both the FDA and the CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices are on the threshold of revising how vaccines are approved and used in the U.S., but whether that opens to a precipice or a new era of stronger evidence and safer use is in the telling of the beholder.
After about a two-week absence as the U.S. FDA’s CBER director, Vinay Prasad’s return overall prompted a mild reaction on Wall Street for some stocks tied to companies developing cell and gene therapies.
The news that Vinay Prasad has stepped down as CBER director at the U.S. FDA had some biotech stocks literally jumping in joy as the market opened July 30. Meanwhile, Prasad’s decisions regarding vaccine development, as well as actions by Makary and HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy, are coming under fire.
The realignment within the U.S. FDA continued with reports of the removal of two high level executives. When asked by BioWorld if the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research’s (CBER) Office of Therapeutic Products director and deputy director had been forced out and if so, why, an HHS spokesperson responded on background with a single sentence: “Center directors deserve to be supported by managers that are aligned with aggressive goals to expeditiously advance therapeutics for rare diseases using the gold standard of science.”
The appointment May 6 of Vinay Prasad as the head of the U.S. FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) “bodes poorly” for Sarepta Therapeutics Inc.’s development-stage pipeline, said Wainwright analyst Mitchell Kapoor – and Wall Street reflected as much, as the stock (NASDAQ:SRPT) ended that day down 26.6% vs. an XBI drop of 6.6% – this ahead of the after-hours earnings disclosure that pushed the Cambridge, Mass.-based firm down even farther by more than another 20%, with the XBI unchanged.
U.S. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary is starting to fill the vacancies at the agency that’s seen its senior leadership ravaged by retirements and terminations. Makary’s first pick is Vinay Prasad as the new head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation & Research (CBER), the center that oversees vaccines, blood products, allergenics and cellular, tissue and gene therapies.
