Sotera Health Holdings LLC has finalized a $408 million settlement for litigation over the company’s use of ethylene oxide (EtO) at a Sterigenics facility in Willowbrook, Ill., although litigation is still pending in connection with sites in other U.S. states. The news comes as med-tech trade associations register their disappointment with an EPA proposed rule for EtO that both the Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) and the Advanced Medical Technology Association (Advamed) argue would crimp availability of sterilization capacity, which would in turn create shortages of medical devices and supplies that are desperately needed by patients.
Manufacturing deficiencies stand in the way of two BLAs as complete response letters (CRLs) were issued to Eli Lilly and Co. and to Alvotech Holdings SA. The U.S. FDA issued the CRL to Lilly regarding the BLA for mirikizumab, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody to treat ulcerative colitis, specifically citing manufacturing concerns. There’s a similar problem with Alvotech’s biosimilar candidate for Abbvie Inc.’s Humira (adalimumab). The FDA issued a CRL for AVT-02’s BLA, citing problems needing resolution at its Reykjavik, Iceland, manufacturing facility before it could approve the application.
The U.S. FDA’s surveillance of duodenoscopes and other endoscopes was initially driven by concerns about device sterility, but recent inspections of manufacturing sites operated by Olympus Medical Systems Corp., in Japan have fed warning letters for lapses from various regulations. In the latest warning letter, the agency cited one of the company’s sites in Tokyo for both quality system and medical device reporting lapses, the second warning letter issued to the company in roughly three months.
The U.K.’s medicines and vaccines manufacturing environment needs a complete overhaul, with the worrying decline in exports and investment in the country addressed, if the UK is to beat global competition, the Medicines Manufacturing Industry Partnership believes.
The U.S. FDA has had a long-standing guidance dealing with drug manufacturing facilities that delay or deny FDA investigators’ attempts to inspect a manufacturing facility, but that policy was exclusive of device manufacturing facilities up until passage of the FDA Reauthorization Act (FDARA) of 2017. FDARA’s expansion of the policy to include device manufacturing facilities has prompted a rewrite of an existing 2014 guidance.
The U.S. FDA has had a long-standing guidance dealing with drug manufacturing facilities that delay or deny FDA investigators’ attempts to inspect a manufacturing facility, but that policy was exclusive of device manufacturing facilities up until passage of the FDA Reauthorization Act (FDARA) of 2017. FDARA’s expansion of the policy to include device manufacturing facilities has prompted a rewrite of an existing 2014 guidance.
The U.S. FDA’s use of remote regulatory assessments (RRAs) during the pandemic may have been inevitable, but a proposed continuation of the program in the endemic phase of the SARS-CoV-2 contagion hasn’t necessarily won over device manufacturers.
With only a year to go before 100% compliance with the U.S. Drug Supply Chain Security Act’s serialization provisions will be required from the beginning to the end of the drug supply chain, most biopharma manufacturers are pretty confident they’re ready for the Nov. 27, 2023, deadline. But distributors? Not so much. And they lay the blame at the manufacturers’ feet.
With only a year to go before 100% compliance with the U.S. Drug Supply Chain Security Act’s serialization provisions will be required from the beginning to the end of the drug supply chain, most biopharma manufacturers are pretty confident they’re ready for the Nov. 27, 2023, deadline. But distributors? Not so much. And they lay the blame at the manufacturers’ feet.
After years of dialogue between the U.S. FDA and industry, the agency’s long-awaited draft guidance for computer software assurance (CSA) for manufacturing facilities signaled a new, less cumbersome approach to validating these systems. However, drug and device manufacturers registered concerns about a lack of clarity in the draft, including 23andMe Holding Co., which said the draft’s references to methods that merely “help to fulfill” validation requirements leave too much gray area to be helpful.
